My favorite debate!! Hey check this out, it's so true:

Love that video. Why? Because the content is so accurate! You can pick up a pebble that looks like a ship off the ground and look at it closely. The softer parts will have worn away and the harder parts will stay, but it's time and chance. On the other hand, if you pick up an arrowhead you immediately know that someone made it with a plan and a purpose.

Logic and observation are two very important parts of science, and I'm about to show you a little more than that video.

Just like the guy said, if there's a building there must be a builder. If there's a painting, there's got to be a painter. Scientists aren't going to walk into a city and say it formed over millions of years of erosion and deposition of wood and metal to make the buildings! (If they ever do that, they will all need to be sent to an insane asylum!)

An explosion in a paper factory won't make a stack of books appear or write your essay for you.

Earlier today I was watching a video with my brother for school and it said that some secular scientists actually think that aliens created earth, particularly the Grand Canyon. Perhaps they took a giant laser and carved out the entire plateau! Really people? Is this what we've come to?

Now, on the subject of Neanderthals. Yes, they were differently proportioned; because of different living conditions and bone diseases. Not because of evolution!

Have you seen all the question marks in evolutionary charts? Often people will say, "Evolution is science, creation is religion," but that's not true! In fact, it's exactly the opposite. The Bible is way ahead of science. Do you know why snakes can't grow legs? Because when the devil came to Eve as a serpent, God cursed all snakes and made it so the can't grow the legs that their genes are supposed to produce!

ts also say there may have been global floods on Mars because of craters and canyons in it's surface, despite the absence of water; yet earth is very full of water and evidence of a global flood and they refuse to say that there was one here.

Yet we find seashells fossilized on mountains and even in deserts, and so many animals are found fossilized out of place. Animals do not usually fossilize in the ocean due to scavengers and decomposition; but in a flood, especially with silica-rich waters, they would rapidly be buried and fossilized. First would be the smaller underwater creatires, then fish, (there was one fossilized while eating another fish!), then finally we would see land animals on the top layers.

In the ark, however, (yes I mean Noah's Ark) you could fit several thousand sheep-sized animals on each of the three football field-length decks! That means Noah would have been able to fit two of every animal on the Ark, including dinosaurs. For those who may wish to say that all dinosaurs were enormous, I beg to differ. Most were about the size of sheep, and even in adulthood most wouldn't be too much larger than a human being, aside from a few.

You may also note that God is the one who sent the animals to Noah, and they would all most likely have been just old enough to leave their mothers; the animal version of 18 years old in human years, I guess you could say.

Also, if the Bible is correct, as I believe it is, then the earth is only about 6,000 years old. Evolutionists often use carbon dating to find the age of objects and such, but carbon dating is a faulty method of measuring age. In order for it to be accurate, you would have to know exactly how much of the carbon in a plant or animal was there before it began to decompose or fossilize, whichever is the case. You would also have to know the exact decomposition rate in order for it to be right.

Because of its faulty nature, carbon dating is naturally a first choice in age measurement of most fossils and the earth in general. It makes things seem much older than they truly are.

There are other, more stable methods of measuring age, however. You can measure age more accurately through gases in the atmosphere, salt accumulation in the oceans, and even earth's magnetic field. The longest measurement done with these was that earth was around 20,000 years old, but the shortest said it is around 10,000 years old. Neither of these are anywhere near a whole million years, let alone billions!

So the painting has a painter, hieroglyphics have a writer, but DNA doesn't have a designer? Somehow that doesn't seem right.

What do you think? Is this a bunch of baloney, or does God exist? Is there a creator? If not, what's the difference between you and a gorilla driving a go-kart? There is none!

And by the way, a 2% difference in DNA is over 60,000 code letter differences! Actually, apes and humans DNA is 86% different..not 2%.

Am I the only one here who sat in front of the TV as a six year old pointing out all the ways they messed up about the earth's age and when dinosaurs lived?

If you have anything to say about this, whether it's to debate or agree, please speak up.